Separation between Church and State. Is it correct?

10 Mars 2023, 07:08am

Publié par el-theus

eltheus, [10/03/2023 05:48]
Isn't it perhap, as it clearly seems, that the State, as bureaucratic admin State, has captured the human beings into it's 'structure of power control' through the expedient institute of 'citizenship'? De we belong to the State or to God, the High Spirit, Nature? Seems well that the State as 'instrument of power and control' 'structure for the adminsitration of human beings and real estate' has captured into it's net, (network) via the institues of citizenship, and ID, human beins, that in reality, at origin belong freely to Nature, God, the High Spirit, the primeval Mother Nature and lived freely on this Earth.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 05:50]
[ Album ]
Renounciation of citizenship. The Big LEVIATHAN (Hobbes) made out of million and billion bodies of peoples.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 06:02]
[ Album ]
The separation of Church and State. The capture by the Church of the idea of 'God', and the capture by the State of the free 'human being', trapped now into the net of the 'admin State', the giant planetary SPIDER NET of the STATE, Global State, Internet, world wide web, of the DoD, USA Department of Defense, and British Crown (royalties on food, & seeds, and headquarters of the 5- 12 eyes spying info structure, & City of London 1 sq. mile capital of world finance speculation with NYSE, Wall Street). Is the separation between Church/ State correct? Is it correct to consider and treat Nature without religiosity and respect, sacredness? It doesn't seem so. Not at all.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 06:03]
The separation of Church and State. The capture by the Church of the idea of 'God', and the capture by the State of the free 'human being', trapped now into the net of the 'admin State', the giant planetary SPIDER NET of the STATE, Global State, Internet, world wide web, of the DoD, USA Department of Defense, and British Crown (royalties on food, & seeds, and headquarters of the 5- 12 eyes spying info structure, & City of London 1 sq. mile capital of world finance speculation with NYSE, Wall Street). Is the separation between Church/ State correct? Is it correct to consider and treat Nature without religiosity and respect, sacredness? Doesn't seems so. Not at all. Why then 'pubic policies' avoid taking into account and consideration the sacred aspects of nature in the name of a 'fake science of exploitation and instrumentalization that gas nothing of scientific, but serves only the purposes of profit adavantages, return on investments, financial speculations interests? Very worng. Very unscientific. Very irreligious, and irrespectful of Nature and all living beings. There right to live, to be free, and healthy, and right to chose for themselves, autodetermination and right to maintain their natural born with biological, as given by nature at birth, body & biological integrity. For all living beings.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 06:38]
The capture of religion into the idea that only the 'Church' holds the monopoly of religion, the Church, or for that matter also the belief of other religions, such as Islam or Judaism, to hold the monopoly over the only 'true faith', 'true religions', has caused the capture by certain institutions of the 'SACREDNESS OF LIFE' into their SYSTESM OF POWER. The same has done the STATE, as a structure of control and power, domination. The STATE has captured the monopoly of CONTROL & SURVEIL, ADMIN the people, who have been turned from natural born free beings, citizens into 'citizings' belonging to the STATE, as property of the State. In this sense we can see this a a 'patriachal appropriation' way of doing. The State as a 'father figure' 'protective and administrative' and the 'citizens' as the 'children' that need to be surveiled, adminstrated, and protected (national security, defense, army). The State as 'paternalistic' or 'maternalistic'. This idea is a projection towards the institution of the State of the parental figures, as protective figures, that 'take care' and admin for the 'children-citizens'. Property of the State, belonging to the State. The more liberal view of the State is the one where more than 'public law', it is 'private law' that runs the affairs between the peoples that interact with one another, establishing contractual relationships (contract law) (commerial law-codes) by 'customary fashion law'. Are 'citizens' 'property of the State'? Who are the 'citizens' of a State'? What criteria, laws, regulate the discrimination between legal nationals, and illegal nationals? Or between citizens and foreigners? citizens and illegal immigrants? Population control (UNFPA). Migration flows control. (borders). WHO and mortality/fertility rates. Geographies and real estates. Do State territories have property of their 'public domain real estate'? Frontiers-borders. The function of Law is to provide distinctions, and LIMITS to POWER. it is not the power to 'command', nor the power to dictate law. Law as 'comand' (Hart), law as positive norm (Kelsen). Law's function at the basis is to put 'limits to power', limits to abuse, excesive violence by strenght , force, and power. In England law intetnded as a way to have and maintain 'civil, cordial and friendly relationships' between peoples, individuals. The Law as conceived more as functional to carry on in Life as free men and women establishing contracts, affairs, freely, according to custumary law, manners, habits, and in a civil dignified way, or less settle disputes arising in court, via 'common law' aka precedent cases, similar cases. To say, Law was not understood and conceived as the 'will of the sovreign', the King, not as a 'command', but in a 'liberal way', law as a 'limitation to Power' when the abuse by the King, the sovreign or monarch, or Ruler was excessive in the use of violence or disrespect towards the peoples. The 'body of law', the 'jurispridence' was that settled and made by the courts, precedent, case law, rather than statute law, primary law. In this sense England and the 'common law' tradition have preserved a more liberal and truthfull understanding of the Law, and its role, function in society, Nature, Life. Whereas to understand and conceive law as an outcome of the 'public body', the State as Sovreign, as 'command from the State', command from the Sovreign, 'from the King', makes the Sovreign, the King, the Ruler, the bourocrat in power become absolute Monarch, Powerful. Turn him and the Law into Dictaorship, Turns Law into the 'will of the dictator' in charge. Now today, we have built a structure of the State as instrument of this Absolute arbitrary Power of Parliament (a bought out institution that does no more represent the will of the people). And in fact 'democracies' are in crisis, since the 'direct participation' to the 'decision making process' in drafting 'public policies' is delegated to 'fake arbitrary' representatives, and not directly by the people themselves, discussing in the 'public forum, arena' as they once used to do.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 06:38]
Or privately, when contracting their personal affairs, via 'contract law', 'custumary law'. The State has become the sole 'source' of legitimate 'official' Law, and Law has lost, or been deprived of, it's original true function that is to LIMIT THE POWER OF GOVERNEMENT, and by that turned to an instrument of CONTROL & SURVEILLANCE, an instrument of Absolute POWER & DICTATORSHIP, by unelected, or pseudo-elected, bought out, bureaucrats.

eltheus, [10/03/2023 07:01]
write it down, then correct the spelling, so much pressure, have to do everything fast.

Commenter cet article